E-mail:

Password:

Scarlet Letter

Other web sites

Archive

Atheist Blogroll

Atheists Have Christian Values Too

Atheists Have Christian Values Too

Aug 21, 2008 at 10:51pm

According to Pat Carnahan, nobody should make the mistake of voting for a president that doesn't have any faith. Apparently, if our next president doesn't have "Christian values" we are doomed. So what exactly are Christian values?

I think that a lot of atheists would take this opportunity to brand "Christian values" as that which is found in the Bible. Once the Bible is defined as a source for values, nearly anyone can present an argument that it isn't even close to a good guide on morals. There are a lot of nice tidbits in the Bible, for sure, like "thou shalt not steal"- but there are conversely a remarkable number of horrific tidbits as well:

If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself: if he were married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master have given him a wife, and she have born him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he shall go out by himself. And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free: Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever.

Leviticus 21:2-6

Or:

If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

Deuteronomy 22:28-29

One could go on and on and list dozens of horrific passages from the Bible, but that is not the purpose of my entry here. What I want to show, is that arguably, any book that can be proclaimed as a book with great moral teaching should definitely not have anything close to the aforementioned passages. I think that much is clear.

I could stop here and say that the Bible reflects what "Christian values" are- but I don't think it does. Realistically, when you think of Christian values, you aren't going to think of raping women, forced labor, pillaging towns, and stoning people for working on the Sabbath. Although those things are part of the Bible, and thusly, part of the Christian religion (and perhaps on another day I'll argue that those who aren't engaging in such things aren't really Christians at all), I don't think they are part of what most people consider are "Christian values". Actually, I don't think Christian values come from the Bible at all.

Even as an atheist, when I think of Christian values, I imagine a high moral code and a high standard of ethics. Someone who is caring, kind, thoughtful, and follows the golden rule- do unto others as they would have done unto you. Surely, Christian values are to be desired.

However, I think Christianity has unabashedly taken credit for these so-called "Christian values". Rape is allowed in the traditional Christian religion- how could a good moral code come from such allowances? I don't think it can. The Ten Commandments aren't enough- four of them talk about which gods you can and can't worship and how you should worship the one true god. And one tells you not to be jealous- something that no human can avoid. The other five seem like a nice code to live by: honor your parents, do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, and don't lie. Something's missing... Actually, a lot is missing.

Wouldn't you expect a world class code of ethics to say something about respecting the wishes of a woman? (Read: don't rape people.) Or perhaps it might say something about being kind to others, or to invest time in the pursuit of knowledge and to better your person so that you may help others. Or... Well you get the picture.

Are The Ten Commandments awful? No, not really. We can just do a lot better. And I do mean, a lot better.

So the next question is... If part of what makes up "Christian values" involves things like not raping people, and that isn't a clear message in the Bible, where did that value come from if not from The Ten Commandments? This question is not easy to answer, but first, the misconception that The Ten Commandments is where we get all our morals from must be broken.

In comes the Code of Hammurabi; he was an ancient Babylonian King. The set of laws it describes is extensive, and there is nothing in The Ten Commandments that cannot be found in the Code of Hammurabi. This early set of Babylonian laws is just one example of several different moral/law codes that existed before the Bible was ever conceived.

To answer the question: "Where do we get our morals?" I ask you to imagine a world where we didn't live by the set of values you envision when you think of "Christian values". What would it be like if everyone thought it okay to rape other people? Or kill people? Or steal other's property? Could the human race exist? I say absolutely not. Our moral code exists today in the fashion it does because we otherwise could not co-exist: our morals have simply been passed through the natural selection filter. People who are genetically more like to rape and kill others are (or were) at a severe selective disadvantage- whereas the people who are more likely to get along with the rest of the species, are going to have a selective advantage over those that don't.

Can it really be that simple? Maybe my answer isn't the answer- in fact, it probably isn't the entire picture. But I do know one thing; we do not get our morals from Christianity; we simply have far more sophisticated morals than that which is brutally described in the Bible. Even if one could somehow show that we did get our morals from the Bible, then we must regress back to earlier codes of law that are vastly similar- very little of Christianity is original.

I then ask- if our morals are formed separate from a 2,000 year old piece of allegorical literature, is it not possible for an atheist to have so-called "Christian values"? In fact, I would far rather our elected representatives have no faith at all; as it is an extremely strong indicator of sufficient critical thinking skills. Now that is a desirable trait in a leader. To say that someone who has no faith also does not have "Christian values" is a blatant lie, and a dangerous exercise in mendacity. It carries with it the supposition that all good morals come from Christianity, and as I have shown, that is a fallacy.

And of course, for the proverbial nail in the cofin:

The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.

That's from the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli, signed into law by John Adams and approved unanimously by Congress.

Comments (9) | Post Comment

simplemindedhafwit

Aug 28, 2008 at 02:09pm

Hammurabi (ruled ca. 1796 BC – 1750 BC) believed that he was chosen by the gods to deliver the law to his people. In the preface to the law code, he states, "Anu and Bel called by name me, Hammurabi, the exalted prince, who feared God, to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land."[5]

HE BELIEVED IN A GOD OR GODS AND FOLLOWED THAT BELIEF! The bible has definately been humanized. It has scripture in it from pre dated writings no doubt. But the fact is as follows:

TO BELIEVE OR NOT TO BELIEVE IS NOT THE QUESTION! Lets say there had never...EVER been a religion, religious or spiritual thought throughout history. Lets say everyone on earth, from the beginning of time never questioned the existance of a god or gods. Since day one we believe that humans are the supreme being. Lets say the only rules on how to treat our fellow humans were designed by our ancestors who never believed in any god or gods and that thought process has been passed down through the centuries to us.

That would make us completely different people today. The way we think today would not exist. The way we interact with our fellow humans today would be beyond our comprehention because it would be the world we know. It would be "the norm" Just as we know the one we exist in now.

Personally I believe that the world would be a very evil place. More so than the one we know now. Imagine if "WE" made every rule (think Romans.think Nazi's) Imagine what it would be like if there was no reason, other than the reasons we have in a world without godliness, to try and do the right thing for the bigger cause.

I have faith in the human race. I believe, for the most part that as a whole people are good. But my mindset is that of living in a world with godliness. If I / we had never considered godliness I believe my thoughts would be completely different.

You can say "Hey I don't believe in god and I'm a good person." But you have to remeber that you are designed from a world that has known and embraced godliness since the beginning of time. Without godliness you could just as easily reply to my comments by saying. "How dare you say this to me! Screw you and everything about you! I'm the almighty and I'm sending my warriors to your home to kill you and your family.

So my point is this: It doesn't really matter if we believe in god or not. What matters is that someone did and it was passed down to us. You may or may not believe in god and that is your right. But without godliness I am certain we wouldn't be able to go outside without a gun to protect ourselves from all the evil that would lurk in every nook and cranny of this world.

I can hear you now.... " THE WORLD IS EVIL YOU STUPID SIMPLEMINDEDHAFWIT!" But try if you can to imagine it without a history of godliness.

Andrew

Aug 29, 2008 at 04:07am

The purpose of Hammurabi was to show simply that the Bible is not the source of our ethics. It shows that there are other codes of ethics, very similar to that of The Ten Commandments, developed before the Bible was conceived- or even Yahweh himself.

What's interesting, though, is your comment about religion never existing. You say the world would be a different place, but we could never know what it is. I'm with you there. You then go on to contradict this though, by saying that you believe it would be an evil place, and then proceeded to compare it to the Romans and Nazis. How can you make such claims about a world that you said would be beyond our comprehension? I could just as easily claim, without evidence like you have done, that a godless world would be a blissful utopia instead of a framework for chaos. This however, is neither here nor there, and has really nothing to do with my post.

The truth is, whether or not religion has affected us as a race, and more importantly, how it has affected us is a completely different topic. Incidentally, all I'm saying is that a "moral code" does not require a deity to exist- a moral code can exist without a supernatural element. That is the main part of my blog post.

But then, you freely admit that belief is irrelevant, and it's the act of believing that matters? The actual existence of a deity matters not- yes? (You said that it doesn't matter if we believe or not, but then went on to say that what matters is that someone did believe. That doesn't make any sense!)

Would it then follow that moral codes and ethics have been derived from man and not a supernatural source? That is, if the existence of a god does not matter.

Nobody is saying religion didn't affect humanity- it did, to a very vast extent. In fact, I find it interesting to ponder whether or not religion and a belief in the supernatural was in fact inevitable given human predispositions.

Perhaps even more shocking is that you claim that without god, I could simply kill you. Therefore, it seems you are claiming that the only thing holding you back from murder, rape, and thievery is a supernatural being watching over your shoulder. I find that rather shocking.

The true key is human empathy- our ability to put ourselves in the shoes of others and feel compassion for others. No supernatural element is required.

simplemindedhafwit

Aug 29, 2008 at 09:39am

I begin my statement above by saying "Let's say" or in the words of Rod Serling "Imagine if you will." I'm throwing ideas out there. "What if's."

You're right I don't know what the world would be like without a history of godliness. But I believe it would be much different than the world we know today. And as much as I believe in the human race I'm forced to believe it would be a lot worse than it is now.

Take raising children for an example. If the elder sibling is allowed to do things that are wrong and not be punished for those things, odds are good the the younger sibling will follow suit. If the elder sibling is punished, odds are good the younger will see this and do the right thing. That of course is not the case with every one but it is a guideline for natural human behavior. Given what we know about what happens when certain groups decide they are right and every one else is wrong (Taliban, Hezbollah, Nazi's etc) anything can happen.

You are correct "moral code" does not require a deity to exist. But again we are thinking only in terms of what we know the world to be today. A world with a history of godliness.

You say that empathy is the key. Again our thought process is that of a world with a history of godliness. The word "empathy" might not even exist if we didn't have godliness in our lives.

I'm not saying we should trick every one and make them believe there is a god that we should fear even though we know there is not one. I'm saying that without that belief streaming from the beginning of our existance as humans and knowing what we know about human behavior, odds are good this world would be much more evil than it is today.

You are right about the horrific stories in the bible. You are right about it NOT being a good guideline for moral code. The bible has been humanized over the centuries. It has been squeezed into what humans want it to be. This is yet another example of what humans do when things don't go exactly as they want.

No one can prove or diprove the existance of a god or gods. (not necessairly the god we know from the bible) No one can prove or disprove wether or not the bible was written by the hand of a god or gods.

My point is: It's the believing that got us where we are today.

Andrew

Aug 29, 2008 at 10:52am

You said: "You're right I don't know what the world would be like without a history of godliness."

You then said: "odds are good this world would be much more evil than it is today"

Your argument doesn't mean anything to me because there is no substance. You're speculating on what the world would be like without a belief in a deity. Incidentally, you're speculating on this world right after you tell me that nobody can know what the world is like. I repeat my statement in my last post: I could just as easily claim, without evidence like you have done, that a godless world would be a blissful utopia instead of a framework for chaos.

Just like nobody can prove or disprove the Bible, or any other holy text, was written by supernatural elements, nobody can prove or disprove that leprechauns wrote it either. Do you see where I'm going with this? I can say anyone wrote it. (Actually, I would believe that people would tell you that the Bible is divinely inspired.)

Saying that "the believing that got us where we are today" doesn't mean much to me. That's like saying, "it's light out because the sun shines" or "the music is loud because the volume is up". The human race has only one history.

I'm not sure what you're getting at with your sibling comparison. And I'm not sure what groups thinking they are right has to do with this. Those groups can believe in god and still commit acts of atrocities. They can believe and still do bad things. How does this help your argument?

hwndoecq - hwndoecq

Dec 31, 2008 at 02:38pm

[...] hwndoecq [...]

Post Comment

Post Comment

Why not register?