Hammurabi (ruled ca. 1796 BC – 1750 BC) believed that he was chosen by the gods to deliver the law to his people. In the preface to the law code, he states, "Anu and Bel called by name me, Hammurabi, the exalted prince, who feared God, to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land."[5]
HE BELIEVED IN A GOD OR GODS AND FOLLOWED THAT BELIEF! The bible has definately been humanized. It has scripture in it from pre dated writings no doubt. But the fact is as follows:
TO BELIEVE OR NOT TO BELIEVE IS NOT THE QUESTION! Lets say there had never...EVER been a religion, religious or spiritual thought throughout history. Lets say everyone on earth, from the beginning of time never questioned the existance of a god or gods. Since day one we believe that humans are the supreme being. Lets say the only rules on how to treat our fellow humans were designed by our ancestors who never believed in any god or gods and that thought process has been passed down through the centuries to us.
That would make us completely different people today. The way we think today would not exist. The way we interact with our fellow humans today would be beyond our comprehention because it would be the world we know. It would be "the norm" Just as we know the one we exist in now.
Personally I believe that the world would be a very evil place. More so than the one we know now. Imagine if "WE" made every rule (think Romans.think Nazi's) Imagine what it would be like if there was no reason, other than the reasons we have in a world without godliness, to try and do the right thing for the bigger cause.
I have faith in the human race. I believe, for the most part that as a whole people are good. But my mindset is that of living in a world with godliness. If I / we had never considered godliness I believe my thoughts would be completely different.
You can say "Hey I don't believe in god and I'm a good person." But you have to remeber that you are designed from a world that has known and embraced godliness since the beginning of time. Without godliness you could just as easily reply to my comments by saying. "How dare you say this to me! Screw you and everything about you! I'm the almighty and I'm sending my warriors to your home to kill you and your family.
So my point is this: It doesn't really matter if we believe in god or not. What matters is that someone did and it was passed down to us. You may or may not believe in god and that is your right. But without godliness I am certain we wouldn't be able to go outside without a gun to protect ourselves from all the evil that would lurk in every nook and cranny of this world.
I can hear you now.... " THE WORLD IS EVIL YOU STUPID SIMPLEMINDEDHAFWIT!" But try if you can to imagine it without a history of godliness.
Aug 29, 2008 at 04:07am
The purpose of Hammurabi was to show simply that the Bible is not the source of our ethics. It shows that there are other codes of ethics, very similar to that of The Ten Commandments, developed before the Bible was conceived- or even Yahweh himself.
What's interesting, though, is your comment about religion never existing. You say the world would be a different place, but we could never know what it is. I'm with you there. You then go on to contradict this though, by saying that you believe it would be an evil place, and then proceeded to compare it to the Romans and Nazis. How can you make such claims about a world that you said would be beyond our comprehension? I could just as easily claim, without evidence like you have done, that a godless world would be a blissful utopia instead of a framework for chaos. This however, is neither here nor there, and has really nothing to do with my post.
The truth is, whether or not religion has affected us as a race, and more importantly, how it has affected us is a completely different topic. Incidentally, all I'm saying is that a "moral code" does not require a deity to exist- a moral code can exist without a supernatural element. That is the main part of my blog post.
But then, you freely admit that belief is irrelevant, and it's the act of believing that matters? The actual existence of a deity matters not- yes? (You said that it doesn't matter if we believe or not, but then went on to say that what matters is that someone did believe. That doesn't make any sense!)
Would it then follow that moral codes and ethics have been derived from man and not a supernatural source? That is, if the existence of a god does not matter.
Nobody is saying religion didn't affect humanity- it did, to a very vast extent. In fact, I find it interesting to ponder whether or not religion and a belief in the supernatural was in fact inevitable given human predispositions.
Perhaps even more shocking is that you claim that without god, I could simply kill you. Therefore, it seems you are claiming that the only thing holding you back from murder, rape, and thievery is a supernatural being watching over your shoulder. I find that rather shocking.
The true key is human empathy- our ability to put ourselves in the shoes of others and feel compassion for others. No supernatural element is required.
Aug 29, 2008 at 09:39am
I begin my statement above by saying "Let's say" or in the words of Rod Serling "Imagine if you will." I'm throwing ideas out there. "What if's."
You're right I don't know what the world would be like without a history of godliness. But I believe it would be much different than the world we know today. And as much as I believe in the human race I'm forced to believe it would be a lot worse than it is now.
Take raising children for an example. If the elder sibling is allowed to do things that are wrong and not be punished for those things, odds are good the the younger sibling will follow suit. If the elder sibling is punished, odds are good the younger will see this and do the right thing. That of course is not the case with every one but it is a guideline for natural human behavior. Given what we know about what happens when certain groups decide they are right and every one else is wrong (Taliban, Hezbollah, Nazi's etc) anything can happen.
You are correct "moral code" does not require a deity to exist. But again we are thinking only in terms of what we know the world to be today. A world with a history of godliness.
You say that empathy is the key. Again our thought process is that of a world with a history of godliness. The word "empathy" might not even exist if we didn't have godliness in our lives.
I'm not saying we should trick every one and make them believe there is a god that we should fear even though we know there is not one. I'm saying that without that belief streaming from the beginning of our existance as humans and knowing what we know about human behavior, odds are good this world would be much more evil than it is today.
You are right about the horrific stories in the bible. You are right about it NOT being a good guideline for moral code. The bible has been humanized over the centuries. It has been squeezed into what humans want it to be. This is yet another example of what humans do when things don't go exactly as they want.
No one can prove or diprove the existance of a god or gods. (not necessairly the god we know from the bible) No one can prove or disprove wether or not the bible was written by the hand of a god or gods.
My point is: It's the believing that got us where we are today.
Aug 29, 2008 at 10:52am
You said: "You're right I don't know what the world would be like without a history of godliness."
You then said: "odds are good this world would be much more evil than it is today"
Your argument doesn't mean anything to me because there is no substance. You're speculating on what the world would be like without a belief in a deity. Incidentally, you're speculating on this world right after you tell me that nobody can know what the world is like. I repeat my statement in my last post: I could just as easily claim, without evidence like you have done, that a godless world would be a blissful utopia instead of a framework for chaos.
Just like nobody can prove or disprove the Bible, or any other holy text, was written by supernatural elements, nobody can prove or disprove that leprechauns wrote it either. Do you see where I'm going with this? I can say anyone wrote it. (Actually, I would believe that people would tell you that the Bible is divinely inspired.)
Saying that "the believing that got us where we are today" doesn't mean much to me. That's like saying, "it's light out because the sun shines" or "the music is loud because the volume is up". The human race has only one history.
I'm not sure what you're getting at with your sibling comparison. And I'm not sure what groups thinking they are right has to do with this. Those groups can believe in god and still commit acts of atrocities. They can believe and still do bad things. How does this help your argument?
Dec 31, 2008 at 02:38pm
[...] hwndoecq [...]


simplemindedhafwit
Aug 28, 2008 at 02:09pm